Hp X Lightweight Laptops
Hewlett Packard has a very good reputation for a range of products, including calculators, printers, scanners, laptops, mainframe computers and many other technological devices. Lenovo was founded in Beijing in 1984. Originally known as Legend, Lenovo acquired the PC business of IBM in 2005. Both have an excellent provenance which is reflected in the quality of their products.When comparing these two laptop brands, it should be kept in mind that each has a number of options to offer. Lenovo PCs can range in price from over $2000 to under $400. HP laptops can be even more expensive at the top end. Fundamentally, you get what you pay for, and when comparing two brands it can only be done in general terms.
How do you compare a $3,000 HP with a $500 Lenovo and vice versa? HP vs Lenovo – Top of the Pops in LaptopsLenovo and HP are a step above Samsung and other popular brands in terms of popular laptops. It’s never easy to choose between two machines of broadly similar performance although we are about to answer some of your questions and help you make that choice. What is it that you want from a laptop? Here are some options. Lenovo laptops are generally regarded as offering good design, excellent functionality, and superb display features.
They also offer good value for money. HP is also lauded for its design, and specifically for its audio quality. However, it does tend to fall down on display features in comparison to Lenovo. Lenovo tends to offer more value for money when comparing similarly priced models.
Lightweight Laptops Review
Lenovo vs HP: ReliabilityAs expected with two well-known laptop brands, there is little to choose between them with regard to reliability. Both should be dependable for functionality.
Both are just as bad for keyboard character wear – not good for professional use (inset white characters would be better than foil stamped). Like all laptops, you may find some issues with your purchase.Because HP laptops are excellent for gaming and other entertainment formats, and Lenovo seems best for business, it is easy to make false comparisons. That said, the HP runs well – it is extremely reliable in the very demanding entertainment genre. It is, therefore, equally reliable for business use. What’s the Difference?In general terms, there is not a lot between Lenovo and HP laptops. As with many, the range of models offered by each company covers just about anything you would want of a laptop. However, most people find that each brand can handle both of these types of use more than adequately.
It’s only when you get above $1000 that you will see any significant difference between them.The model you choose is extremely important. In order to provide a better comparison in the Lenovo vs. HP battle, here are two similarly priced models of each brand directly compared against each other. Lenovo vs HP Laptops: Head to Head to Head Comparison. $1044Analysis of Data on Lenovo and HP LaptopsAs already noted, Lenovo laptops tend to have the better display options. They offer a high level of personalization and multi-screen facility.
Both Lenovo and HP offer a number of options to render the screen easier to read for those whose sight is limited. Ease of access includes the ability to optimize the screen magnification, increase contrast and change keyboard options.
Gaming or Business?Those whose priorities are and entertainment tend to prefer the HP, while the Lenovo laptops are generally better for business use. Lenovo laptops can handle large business applications with ease: business suites such as Microsoft Office and QuickBooks 2017. The Lenovo ThinkPad’s are ideal and very reliable for this type of business application, particularly the ThinkPad P50 at over $2,000.HP? Not so much. But they can. For a lower cost solution, the HP Stream 11 at around $400 is likely the best for QuickBooks, but its 32GB storage may not leave much room for anything else. Business:Lenovo is more convenient for professionals.
Lenovo has recognized its target audience very early and since then they have designed laptops that are more business oriented. Features like extra portability, increased, battery life, presentation help are major ones to note down. HP lags in these areas and is much behind than Lenovo.Over the years, Lenovo has successfully worked on battery life.
They have managed to get a very good score at laptop battery life tests. Recently the Lenovo ThinkPad X60s was tested and it has a battery life of 8 hours and 16 minutes, the best ever till date.Portability is one major thing that is always found in the prospectus of the laptop they manufacture and they sure must be really proud of it. Lenovo is always been praised for the light weight laptops. It really helps when you carry them from one place to another, from one meeting to other. Although not specifically designed for gaming it is quite adequate. Movies and Music:We chose not to review the HP Omen 17 here due to the range in prices of its variants.
However, even the mid-range HP Omen 17-w102na at around $1500 offers excellent game-playing and movie functionality. Its 17.3-inch display at 1920×1080 resolution combines with Bang & Olufsen sound for fantastic music, movie downloads, videos, and games.All your entertainment sounds and looks lifelike – as if you were right there in the venue! All that plus storage space for 250,000 songs and 440 hours of standard DVD video (120 hours of HD video)! The 128 Gb solid state drive offers the speed of action you want in a top quality entertainment-grade laptop. Laptop Reliability and Service:It is very difficult to beat Apple for support. However, Lenovo gets pretty close. Unlock andromax m2y all operator. Were we purchasing a laptop based on support alone, it would be a) Apple then b) Acer and then c) Lenovo.
HP would appear around #5 with 225% times the waiting time on the phone than Lenovo.Also, Lenovo offers 24/7 support. HP offer support on weekdays from 8 am – 12 am and at weekends from 9m to 9 pm. Both brands are reliable, although it is good to know that if anything goes wrong with your Lenovo, you can get support all day and night, seven days a week. Lenovo vs HP battle: Bottom LineBoth these brands, and the four models we chose for out test, are excellent. Differences between them are generally small, although there is a significant difference between models in the two price levels. You cannot really compare a $500 laptop with a $1,000 alternative. However, within each price range, it was evident that the Lenovo was the business model and the HP better in most ways for entertainment and games use.Lenovo has the edge because of its focus on helpful business features.
HP is not quite up to speed with Lenovo on the business end but it comes close. You can still get all your work done easily and efficiently, but it may use a good bit of battery power if you are away from a power source – and your laptop will likely be a bit heftier to lug around. Lenovo for BusinessIf you are looking for a business laptop for your own use or for employees, then Lenovo offers you perfectly adequate quality at lower price. QuickBooks operates well on Lenovo machines.
The Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Mobile Workstation is ideal for QuickBooks and other accountancy software packages. However, we are talking $1500 to over $2000 here. HP for EntertainmentBoth are great laptops and you cannot go wrong whichever you buy. However, if you want a machine to play games with or watch movies, then HP tends to so that better than Lenovo. It’s difficult to beat the HP Omen for playing games.
However, at around $1,000 to around $2,000 what more should expect than one of the best? OverallOverall, HP generally has the edge over Lenovo laptops. It has a long history and understands what various market sectors and types of business requirements. HP machines are reliable and great for most types of entertainment applications. If you intend using your laptop for business use, then Lenovo has the pedigree. So, Lenovo vs HP Think about what you are using it for and then answer the question yourself. My experience with HP laptops left me with a very sour taste for the product line.Over the course of 6 years I bought 3 HP laptops 2 years between each purchase.
I bought very capable relatively advanced machines so my daughters could use them during both high school and college.All three failed. All three had the same problems. You would think that HP would identify problems and fix them in the next rev of their product.Total fail. Complete waste of money. If you are going to buy HP, my experience is buy the cheapest possible and plan to use it as a door stop since they are NOT reliable over a several year period.Goodbye permanently to HP.
They never learned from their mistakes and I took on the chin three times over 6 years.
Bad news for fans of the: That 12.5-inch business convertible is going away. Good news for traveling execs everywhere: It's been replaced by a trimmer third generation of the model 1030 that fits a 13-inch screen into a 12-inch chassis. The EliteBook x360 1030 G3 ($2,149 as tested) keeps the larger display of our former Editors' Choice for business 2-in-1s, the, but lops half an inch each off its width and depth. It's a handily compact, highly configurable, easy pick to replace its predecessor as an Editors' Choice among business 2-in-1s. An HP rep told us that the EliteBook x360 1030 G3 starts at $1,449 with a Core i5 CPU and a 128GB solid-state drive (SSD). For $2,149, the Windows 10 Pro test unit I have on hand combines a 1.9GHz (4.2GHz turbo) Core i7-8650U quad-core processor with Intel UHD Graphics 620 integrated silicon; 16GB of RAM; a 512GB PCI Express SSD; and a 400-nit, full HD (1,920-by-1,080-pixel) glossy touch screen.Your other display options are a full HD panel with HP's Sure View privacy screen, which (at the press of the F2 key) darkens the panel and narrows its field of view to thwart airline or train seatmate snoops, and a 4K (3,840-by-2,160-pixel) touch display.
SSD choices range up to 2TB, though main memory peaks at 16GB. If you're worried that the EliteBook x360's light weight makes it flimsy, relax: The system has passed MIL-STD tests for toughness, and there's no flex when you grasp its screen corners or mash its keys. In fact, when you fold it into tablet mode, magnets snap the screen into place to give you a firm surface for writing or sketching. That's an idea other convertibles would do well to copy.The slender left edge is home to a USB 3.1 Type-A port, a headphone jack, the power button, and a nano-SIM slot for mobile broadband. On the right, you'll find an HDMI port, a cable-lockdown security slot, two Thunderbolt 3/USB Type-C ports, and a volume rocker for use in tablet mode. The AC adapter makes use of a USB-C connector. You get USB Type-C-to-Ethernet and USB-C-to-USB-A dongles in the box; the latter is useful for HP's optional Rechargeable Active Pen ($76), which has a covered USB Type-C port near its top.
The company says the stylus runs for a week on a half-hour charge, sparing its users from having to hunt for esoteric AAAA or watch batteries. The pressure-sensitive, programmable-buttoned pen clings magnetically to the 2-in-1's side. (Alas, there is no niche or slot for storing it inside the notebook.)A Fine Set of FeaturesWindows Hello users can avoid typing passwords via either a fingerprint reader or HP's face-recognition webcam. The latter captures exceptionally clear and well-lit images. Also exceptionally clear: Sound from those four Bang & Olufsen speakers, with startling volume and bass considering the system's small size plus soaring highs and rich instrumentals. More than all but a few laptops I've sampled, it's a pleasure to listen to. I'm not a big fan of HP's Sure View screen technology—while it does effectively block the view of the spy sitting beside you, it makes your own view dim enough for an eyestrain headache.
Also, I think 4K resolution makes display elements too small and squinty at the 13.3-inch screen size. So the good old 1080p IPS panel on the test unit is the one I'd choose, and it's first-class, with ample brightness, wide viewing angles, and high contrast. Colors are vivid, and details are sharp.I'm even less of a fan of one quirk in HP notebooks' keyboard layouts—the cursor-arrow keys arrayed in a klutzy row instead of an inverted T, with half-height up and down arrows sandwiched between full-height left and right arrows. But except for that perennial peeve, I must admit that the EliteBook x360's keyboard is easy to like, with adequate travel and a nice, clicky feel. Like other EliteBooks, it features not only a handy microphone mute key but dedicated keys for answering and ending Skype calls. Both the large touchpad and the touch screen work smoothly and precisely.Testing a Solid Productivity PartnerI compared the 1030 G3 to four other business 2-in-1 models, two of them from Lenovo—the ThinkPad X380 Yoga and —and two from Dell, the convertible Latitude 7390 2-in-1 and detachable.
Their core components are outlined below. Overall, the HP performed as expected: Like other ultraportables with integrated graphics, it's a top-notch choice for taking productivity apps on the road, if a miserable one for playing the latest games. And what it lacks in raw CPU power, it more than makes up for in battery life. Productivity, Storage, and Media TestsPCMark 10 and 8 are holistic performance suites developed by the PC benchmark specialists at UL (formerly Futuremark).
Acer Lightweight Laptops
The PCMark 10 test we run simulates different real-world productivity and content-creation workflows. We use it to assess overall system performance for office-centric tasks such as word processing, spreadsheeting, Web browsing, and videoconferencing. The test generates a proprietary numeric score; higher numbers are better.PCMark 8, meanwhile, has a Storage subtest that we use to assess the speed of the system's storage subsystem.
This score is also a proprietary numeric score; again, higher numbers are better. The EliteBook came out on top in both benchmarks, although by an insignificant amount in the PCMark 8 Storage subtest among these 2-in-1s with their speedy SSDs. It's more than capable of whisking through your Microsoft Office or Google Docs workload.Next is Maxon's CPU-crunching Cinebench R15 test, which is fully threaded to make use of all available processor cores and threads.
Cinebench stresses the CPU rather than the GPU to render a complex image. The result is a proprietary score indicating a PC's suitability for processor-intensive workloads.HP makes several great mobile workstations. The 1030 G3 isn't one—it was a bit of an underachiever in this test despite its quad-core Core i7, just as the Core i5-based Latitude 5290 2-in-1 was an overachiever. Subjectively, however, the EliteBook felt quick and responsive; it won't keep even the most impatient users waiting.
We also run a custom Adobe Photoshop image-editing benchmark. Using an early 2018 release of the Creative Cloud version of Photoshop, we apply a series of 10 complex filters and effects to a standard JPEG test image. We time each operation and, at the end, add up the total execution time. (Lower times are better.) The Photoshop test stresses the CPU, storage subsystem, and RAM, but it can also take advantage of most GPUs to speed up the process of applying filters, so systems with powerful graphics chips or cards may see a boost.The Core i7-powered HP and Latitude 7390 2-in-1 asserted themselves here, crossing the line in a photo finish. Either would be fine for managing and touching up a digital image collection. Graphics Tests3DMark measures relative graphics muscle by rendering sequences of highly detailed, gaming-style 3D graphics that emphasize particles and lighting. We run two different 3DMark subtests, Sky Diver and Fire Strike, which are suited to different types of systems.
Both are DirectX 11 benchmarks, but Sky Diver is more suited to laptops and midrange PCs, while Fire Strike is more demanding and made for high-end PCs to strut their stuff. The results are proprietary scores. Merely adequate scores across the board, as these systems with their on-chip integrated graphics can't come anywhere near the results of gaming and multimedia laptops with dedicated GPUs. As I said, they're suitable for casual or browser-based games, not demanding 3D titles.Next up is another synthetic graphics test, this time from Unigine Corp. Like 3DMark, the Superposition test renders and pans through a detailed 3D scene and measures how the system copes. In this case, it's rendered in the company's eponymous Unigine engine, offering a different 3D workload scenario than 3DMark, for a second opinion on the machine's graphical prowess.
We present two Superposition results, run at the 720p Low and 1080p High presets. These scores are reported in frames per second (fps). For lower-end systems, maintaining at least 30fps is the realistic target, while more powerful computers should ideally attain at least 60fps at the test resolution.Thirty frames per second, did I say? As you can see, that goal's out of reach even at lower resolution and light-years away at full HD. Video Playback Battery Rundown TestAfter fully recharging the laptop, we set up the machine in power-save mode (as opposed to balanced or high-performance mode) where available and make a few other battery-conserving tweaks in preparation for our unplugged video rundown test. (We also turn Wi-Fi off, putting the laptop into airplane mode.) In this test, we loop a video—a locally stored 720p file of the open-source Blender demo movie —with screen brightness set at 50 percent and volume at 100 percent until the system conks out.
The HP showed impressive stamina here, managing almost 15-and-a-half hours before giving up the ghost. The Latitude 7390 2-in-1 was the only other machine to break the 12-hour mark. If you need to work through a long flight, or you want to put in a full workday plus some tablet-mode video viewing at home afterwards, the EliteBook is ready to keep up.Flying Corporate ClassIT managers will appreciate that the EliteBook x360 1030 G3 ships with not only an Intel vPro processor but also a crop of security and manageability features, ranging from HP Sure Start (which protects the BIOS from rootkit attacks) to Sure Click (which isolates Web processes to fight malware) and Sure Recover (which can replace a corrupted software image). The three-year rather than one-year warranty is welcome, too.